Abstract/Summary

Qualitative research has a great deal to offer Construction Management Research, most notably in the way in which the judicious use of theory moves research beyond common sense and introduces new and interesting ways of thinking about recognized problems. However, this contribution is often compromised by a positivist use of the interpretivist approach. This chapter develops this argument by reviewing the defining features of qualitative research and making a case for the centrality of theory. Drawing on Sandberg and Alvesson’s (2021) typology, it contrasts the positivist ‘representationalist’ use of theory with five other types common in qualitative research and exemplifies them with CMR papers. The five types include: explaining, ordering, comprehending, enacting and provoking. The discussion reflects on the use of each type and highlights their contribution to academic research and practical industry concerns. The chapter concludes with lessons for doctoral students, early career researchers and established scholars.